Khazarian-Zionist Threat

written by Larry McCart in 2008

 

Khazarian-Zionists seem to secretly rejoice that Goyim (Gentiles) are dumb enough to fall for mass media lies that result in Goyim being obedient servants under a Khazarian-Zionist-controlled US federal government.  Those whom the Khazarian-Zionists want to defeat they first indoctrinate with lies (in public schools and through radio, television, and newspapers) in an effort to keep the victims from fighting back. Theodor Herzl was the man behind the dream of a Jewish State.  Herzl was pushed out of power and his movement taken over by Khazarian Zionists in 1903.  Khazarian Zionists are not Jewish in the racial sense, and promote the false concept that they are descendants of the ancient people of the Bible.  Khazarian Zionists have a history of harming Jews, and have been blamed for what happened to Jews during World War Two.  Benjamin H. Freedman, a New York City Jew, in 1961 said that Khazarian Zionists control the US federal government.  According to Theodor Herzl, "When Khazarian Zionists rise, there rises the terrible power of their money."  When Khazarian Zionists are down, they make trouble, frequently demanding what is not theirs.  When Khazarian Zionists are up, they are merciless overlords.  And one is not likely to get on the good side of a Khazarian Zionist, unless one is a Khazarian Zionist. Before the collapse of Soviet communism about half of the Khazarians were atheistic communists mainly residing in the Soviet Union, and about half of the Khazarians were Zionists mainly residing outside of the Soviet Union.  Since the collapse of Soviet communism, many Khazarians have exchanged the communist label for the Zionist label, and have moved to the US and the Zionist State, and continue to work for what seems to be the enslavement of Jews and Gentiles under a one-world totalitarian dictatorship controlled by Khazarians.  From the point of view of Jewish and Gentile slaves, whether the world dictatorship is called communist or Zionist makes little difference. Those of us who believe there is a Khazarian-Zionist plan for world dictatorship, sometimes called the New World Order, have wondered when these Israelite impersonators would make their big move.  It seems their big move started with the fake presidential assassination in 1963 and continued with the so-called Vietnam War. The US federal government and the US mass media have been under Khazarian-Zionist control for decades.  Every cabinet office under Clinton was headed by a Zionist.  Most of what US citizens hear in public schools and see on television and in newspapers is controlled by Khazarian-Zionists.  Truth is available from the Internet. There are not many politicians in the US federal government who will blame Khazarian-Zionists for anything they do, because that would be biting the hand that feeds them — the hand that gives them media support and campaign contributions at election time. Khazarian-Zionist control is one thing; Khazarian-Zionist rule will be quite another.  Ask the Jews and the Palestinians in the Zionist State what it is like to live under Khazarian-Zionist rule.  It seems Khazarian-Zionists want slavery for most Jews and Gentiles who are US citizens. Germany was considered a paradise by Khazarian-Zionists, and Germans were tolerant and generous toward Khazarian-Zionists in the years before Hitler took over.  Khazarian-Zionists consider America a threatening place, and US citizens much more dangerous to them than Germans ever were.  If Khazarian-Zionists achieve world dictatorship, US citizens likely will be treated as if they were unwanted cattle — cattle to be killed off and replaced by better behaving cattle imported from third world nations.  A knowledgeable advisor (a former US Army Ranger) said that detention camps in the US are for exterminating US citizens.  It appears that military activities of the US federal government in Iraq and Afghanistan are part of a Khazarian-Zionist program for world domination — and training for a future attack against US citizens by the military of a US federal government controlled by Khazarian Zionists.   The favorite Khazarian method of extermination is by famine.  This is because it is effective and cheap.  Ukrainians lost several million citizens in the 1930's during a famine caused by atheist-communist cousins of Khazarian Zionists.  Khazarian communists confiscated the guns of Ukrainians, and then Khazarian communists confiscated the food of Ukrainians, and millions of Ukrainians died from starvation. James Bacque wrote two books: Other Losses and Crimes & Mercies.  The first book details Khazarian-Zionist extermination of one million German prisoners of war during and after World War Two.  The other book reveals how Khazarian-Zionists exterminated five million innocent German civilians (Jews and Gentiles) in the first few years after World War Two. What should US Jews and Gentiles do to reduce the Khazarian-Zionist threat?  One effective response would be to remove the main tool used by Khazarian-Zionists in what seems to be their effort to enslave most US Jews and Gentiles.  The main tool is the US federal government.  If US Jews and Gentiles can get a constitutional amendment passed that abolishes the US federal government, the main engine of exploitation used by Khazarian-Zionists will be gone.  The US federal government is not needed, and US Jews and Gentiles would be better off with 50 sovereign states.   ________________________________   12-14-2011 http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2011/12/201112773810926474.html A person can be detained "under the law of war without trial until the end of the hostilities", the bill states.  The so-called hostilities are defined as " the war on terror", and at the moment, "the war on terror" seems to not have an end. The US federal government has used indefinite detention of suspects in its so-called "war on terror".  The US House and US Senate are just a vote away from making the same treatment "legal" for US citizens apprehended within the US, regarding the 2012 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA).  In the US Senate on December 1, 2011, there were 93 votes for and seven votes against this bill.  Senator Rand Paul -- one of seven who voted against the bill -- questions the bill's constitutionality.  Provisions in the bill codify an approach that allows for endless detention of US citizens and non-citizens picked up anywhere in the world.  Provisions in the bill also give the US military the option to detain US citizens suspected of participating in or aiding in terrorist activities without a trial, indefinitely. The chief argument against codifying these provisions and giving the military a role in domestic terrorist investigation is that the system works just fine as it is.  "You can't find any national security experts in favor of these provisions," said Heather Hulburt, executive director of the National Security Network, a non-profit foreign policy organization with a focus on national security.  Hulburt said the US has a very effective criminal justice system with a high conviction rate and severe sentences for those found guilty on terror-related charges. The list of those against the provisions in the bill reads like a who's who of national security professionals -- FBI Director Robert Mueller, CIA Director David Petraeus, Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta, and dozens of senior White House counterterrorism officials; retired generals and retired interrogators have all come out strongly against allowing the US military to police US streets and detain US citizens without trial or access to the US legal system. John Brennan, the White House senior counterterrorism adviser, told a US radio show that he believes the provisions in the bill are unnecessary and that "there is a very strong established track record of dealing successfully with individuals here in the United States who are involved in terrorism-related activities.   12-31-2011 On December 31, 2011, the manager of the US federal government signed into law the 2012 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), in effect abolishing an important part of the US Constitution if the US Supreme Court does not agree that indefinite detention of US citizens without a trial is unconstitutional.  The current manager of the US federal government at the time of the signing declared that he will not use the indefinite detention part of this law against US citizens.  The indefinite detention part of this law more likely will be used against US citizens by the next US federal government manager after January 2013.